Why carrying is where children get stuck
A child who answers 2 + 5 can still stop at 7 + 5, and it is not about the size of the numbers. Carrying, broken into the three steps it really is.
Nine tables, nine facts each: 9 × 9 makes 81 in all. For most children this
is the first mountain of things that simply have to be known by heart. The real pile,
though, is half that size.
3 × 7 and 7 × 3 are both 21. Order does not change the product -
multiplication is commutative. Count each such pair once and the 81 facts collapse
to 45.
Beyond that, the one-times table just gives back the number. Doubling covers the twos. The fives alternate between 0 and 5 in the ones column, and in the nines the two digits always add to nine. The facts with no handle on them at all are fewer still.
This recount matters because it gives a child a number they can see the end of. Eighty-one sounds endless. Strip out the tables that carry their own pattern and what is left is a countable pile.
The last to stick are usually in the sixes, sevens and eights - and specifically where
those tables meet each other: 6 × 7, 7 × 8, 8 × 6.
No pattern to lean on, large products, and neighbouring answers that are easy to confuse.
So a child rarely fails at times tables as a whole. What usually happens is that a handful of specific facts are missing. Starting the chant again from the top reaches each of them exactly once per pass.
Japanese schools teach the tables as a chant. The readings are clipped so the whole line
scans: 7 × 8 becomes shichi-ha gojuuroku. It enters the head as a
line of verse, not as a calculation.
The strength of this is that recall costs nothing. The weakness is that
the facts may only come out in order. A child who freezes at 56 ÷ 7
is often running through the seven times table from the start. Getting at a fact
out of sequence is a separate skill, and needs separate practice.
If the gaps are a handful of specific facts, then a record that does not go down to that level tells you nothing you can act on. "Weak at multiplication" does not say what to repeat.
That is why this drill keeps multiplication in 11 kinds - one per table, plus two that involve a two-digit number. "Never gets the sevens" survives as a fact in the record. The full breakdown is in the 42 kinds.
2 × 13 and 13 × 2 are counted as different kinds too. Same
product, but one is "two, thirteen times" and the other "thirteen, twice", and
the working a child actually does is not the same. They are identical to anyone
who has the commutative law - and whether the child has it is exactly the question.
After the tables come two-digit problems. This drill only asks those whose product stays
below 100 - 2 × 13 and the like. The aim is to thicken the range a child can
still reach mentally, before written methods take over.
Division is laid out the same way. Since 56 ÷ 7 is the seven times table
read backwards, a child missing that fact stops in both places.
One gap, two places it shows up.
You can pick one table and practise only that. No sign-in needed.
For a walk-through with screenshots, see the full introduction.
More reading
A child who answers 2 + 5 can still stop at 7 + 5, and it is not about the size of the numbers. Carrying, broken into the three steps it really is.
A box plus five equals twelve wears the face of addition and asks for subtraction. It needs the equals sign read as a balance, not as a place to write the answer.
Wrong, slow, or not seen for a while - three faces of weakness weighed into one number, plus what has to be added so that practice stays bearable.
Where the four- and ten-second marks came from, and what to do about the case that timing children makes them afraid of maths.
Each is published separately, and all are free to use. Back to the portal Privacy Policy Contact